We invited over a few friends last night to have a tasting of my blueberry stout that just carbed up. Among the other beers had also had on hand was a mixed pack from local Uinta Brewing Company's Organic line. Included in it was their extra pale ale, Wyld, which I really enjoyed when we visited Uinta's taproom in the fall. While a lot of the local beers haven't done a lot for us, it's nice to come across something really nice like this.
Date - 18 February 2012
Venue - My house
==========
Appearance - Clear, golden, with just a little head developing.
Aroma - Lots of stone fruit (apricot, peach); bread is also prominent.
Taste - Fresh, clean malt with a moderate assertive bitterness. Breadiness in the nose is very prominent in the aftertaste. It leaves quickly and cleanly, though a light bitterness lingers.
Mouthfeel - Light and easygoing; moderate carbonation.
Overall - This is a really great session beer; it's almost too drinkable. Light and refreshing, with a lot of flavour. I really like the bready quality, though it might get old after a few pints.
- Br. Absalom
Sunday, February 19, 2012
Wednesday, February 15, 2012
Squatter’s Barrel of Russians tasting
DeAunn and I had an early dinner at SLC brewpub Squatter’s the other night, and brought home this specimen for further research. A Russian imperial stout brewed with licorice root, aged in rye whiskey barrels from the local High West Distillery, and clocking in at 10.5% ABV, it’s right up our collective alley, particularly this time of year.
Date - 13 February 2012
Venue - My house
==========
Appearance - Inky black with a deep brown head of small to medium bubbles that dropped back to a ring after several minutes.
Aroma - Perfumey, muted oak, hints of molasses and chocolate.
Taste - This one immediately goes to the back of the tongue with definite alcohol and licorice. Notes of dark chocolate, subdued oak, and low roast; a little acrid. More chocolate and a balanced sweetness as it warms.
Mouthfeel - Rich and creamy on the front of the tongue; full bodied.
Overall - A big, tasty beer for ski season (should the snow ever arrive in force); dark and acrid in the right ways. Considering picking up another bottle or two to lay down for a year.
- Br. Absalom
Saturday, January 28, 2012
Epic/Crooked Stave Elder Brett tasting
I learned of this new collaboration between SLC’s Epic & Colorado’s Brettanomyces-focused Crooked Stave earlier this week via the Utah Beer blog. It’s fairly big saison that was then aged with four strains of Brett in white wine barrels that previously held Epic’s Belgian golden strong ale fermented with peaches, Brainless on Peaches. Snagged a bottle of this yesterday, and after allowing it time to settle and chill at home, enjoyed it last night. It certainly made an interesting accompaniment to watching The Two Towers.
Date - 27 January 2012
Venue - My house
==========
Poured gold with a substantial head that collapsed after a couple minutes. White wine and green apple in the nose; the taste brought more white wine, phenolics from the yeast, light tartness, and maybe a little fruit. The mouthfeel was pretty light, with medium carbonation; it didn’t sit heavy in the mouth, and definitely didn’t come across as nearly 9%. Overall, it was interesting, but didn’t deliver the funk I was expecting. That may simply mean I need more experience with various strains of Brett, but for me, this beer was dominated by the wine that was originally in the barrels. Given that there’s been a full run of another strong beer through those barrels prior to this, that wine character really seems to be going the distance. I’ll be curious to learn if the Brett is still active in the bottles; if so, I’ll probably pick up a couple more bottles to age and see if any more barnyard/musty/funk character develops.
- Br. Absalom
Date - 27 January 2012
Venue - My house
==========
Poured gold with a substantial head that collapsed after a couple minutes. White wine and green apple in the nose; the taste brought more white wine, phenolics from the yeast, light tartness, and maybe a little fruit. The mouthfeel was pretty light, with medium carbonation; it didn’t sit heavy in the mouth, and definitely didn’t come across as nearly 9%. Overall, it was interesting, but didn’t deliver the funk I was expecting. That may simply mean I need more experience with various strains of Brett, but for me, this beer was dominated by the wine that was originally in the barrels. Given that there’s been a full run of another strong beer through those barrels prior to this, that wine character really seems to be going the distance. I’ll be curious to learn if the Brett is still active in the bottles; if so, I’ll probably pick up a couple more bottles to age and see if any more barnyard/musty/funk character develops.
- Br. Absalom
Thursday, January 26, 2012
Special Delivery
The other day I received a package from Austin Homebrew Supply. Whatever could be in there?
Why, it's 26 ounces of pellet hops, of course! Last week I jumped on a deal put up on Homebrew Finds for an 18-ounce hop variety pack from AHB; most of the hops will fill out my bittering needs for the next several months, though I may have to make some sort of "mixed bag" pale or IPA with them as well. If you're interested, it looks like the sale is still going on as of my writing this. While I was at it, I added a half pound of Kent Goldings pellets to the order for a Burton ale I'm planning.
My tiny hop freezer is nearly bursting at the seams! Looking forward to having an opportunity to do some brewing and put them to use. Not this weekend, but perhaps the following one. This winter has found me missing hoppy homebrews; I see a remedy for that in the near future.
- Br. Abelard
Sunday, January 22, 2012
Beer Flight
It often pays to be a regular at a place. I'm almost tempted to qualify that by saying at some places, but I don't make a habit out of going to places at which it does not pay to be a regular.


I'm a regular at Urban Burger Bar, much to my wife's chagrin. Great food, great beer selection, great people serving both, nice atmosphere, and, well you could say proximity to my workplace, all come together nicely to make it a no-brainer.
I walked in the other day for lunch just as they were opening to find a completely empty place and two beer flights artfully on display at the end of the bar. "We're just taking some new press shots," says Emily, one of the regular bartenders. Before I could ask what "press" they were for, she slid one of the flights in front of me and smiled.
"Edmund, Sprecher, Rasputin, and Allagash White," she says. I checked out the aroma of the first one, and it smelled a lot bigger than Great Lakes' Edmund Fitzgerald. I tasted it, and it tasted a lot bigger than Great Lakes' Edmund Fitzgerald. "I don't remember Edmund being this powerful," I tell Emily. "It can stand up on its own," she says, "it's a good solid porter." Out of curiosity, I tried the third one, North Coast's Old Rasputin, and it smelled and tasted an awful lot like a nice mild, roasty, coffee-like porter...at least I proved to myself that I can tell the difference.
(Cask Conditioned Summit India Pale Ale)
I went back to the first one and enjoyed the rest of the big, powerful Russian Imperial Stout Old Rasputin, followed by the third one, the nice balanced, mild, roasty Edmund Fitzgerald porter. And finally I drank the second one, Sprecher's Abbey Tripel. I left the Allagash White alone for the most part, except for a little taste after the other three. Against the others, the Allagash is practically a palate cleanser, and not lacking at all for that, but perhaps a bit out of place on that flight. Although maybe that's exactly the point.
But what's my point? No point, really. Just that it's nice to be a regular at a place.
Saturday, January 14, 2012
Improvisatory Hopback
A few weeks ago the annual "Gadgets Issue" (35(1)) of Zymurgy appeared in my mailbox, an issue that I have always eagerly anticipated since I became a member of the American Homebrewers Association. There are often some very clever, effective, and cost-efficient homebrew-improvement ideas contained within, and besides, it's simply fun to read about what other homebrewers have thought of to experiment with improving their system, their methods, or both.
The idea that caught my eye most was the "Hop-Squasher", submitted by Courtney Tyvand. Her idea centers on creating a hopback out of a French coffee press. As she writes:
Hop Hearty Ale
Appearance: Poured from a 12 oz. bottle into a 6 ounce tasting glass. Color is amber trending towards the red side of the spectrum, with a sticky foam that leaves lacing down the side of the glass.
Aroma: Not too aggressive, and very well-balanced. Some citrus and mint with a bit of a floral scent as well. Caramel, as the label states, is also present.
Taste: Very clean, and extremely easy to drink due to its balanced flavors. Citrus is more present in the taste up front, followed by some mint and ending with a grassy note. The caramel intertwines throughout. I don't think that it is too present at any point of the tasting.
Mouthfeel and thoughts: Definitely a medium body with plenty of carbonation, but not an overwhelming amount. Very, very easy to quaff, what with the balance and flavors present.

Now for the beer, plus Mt. Hood additions. Below are some pictures:
Hops:

Hops with carafe:
Hop Hearty Ale, Mt. Hood addition
Appearance: Same, with some small bits of hoppy goodness.
Aroma: The aroma has a much sweet floral-ness to it. Obviously the beer is now slightly out of balance and trending towards a floral nose; while not a bad thing, I don't think I'd make a dry hop addition out of it.
Taste: Very similar to the original. This is expected, obviously, as the AA% contribution should be near or at zero.
Mouthfeel and overall: Mouthfeel is obviously similar. The balance is slightly out of whack, of course, but I think it is a huge success as an experiment. The aromas contributed from this amount allowed me to see a hop profile in an entirely new light.
This is something that I think every homebrewer should try. Hop profiles can be a difficult thing to anticipate, and this is a cheap, quick, and fun way to experiment with different hops without losing a bunch of money on a failed batch of beer. In the future I think that I'll try it with multiple varieties of hops, as well as experimenting with length of time in the carafe as well as using more aggressive hops. For the record, I did not refrigerate the beer once the hops were added, but simply kept it out for observation. I think a warmer temperature will help profile the aromas a little bit better. I apologize for the formatting. Something happened to the latter half of this post, and currently I'm too lazy to fix it.
The idea that caught my eye most was the "Hop-Squasher", submitted by Courtney Tyvand. Her idea centers on creating a hopback out of a French coffee press. As she writes:
"I just pour a carafe full of my favorite beer and add a teaspoon or so of hop pellets...and insert the press screen, making sure that the vents are in the 'closed' position, and stick in the fridge for a few minutes. When I'm ready to pour, I twist to the 'open' position and very slowly depress the plunger to clear the hop debris and pour a great tasting pint of uniquely hopped beer. It's nothing fancy, but it is cheap and fun and allows you to play around with a lot of different hop and beer combinations." (p. 23)When I read that I thought to myself, "Hey, I have a coffee press...I have hops...I have beer...I should do this!". And so I did. I decided to use New Glarus' Hop Hearty Ale as my first experiment, with a couple of teaspoons of Mt. Hood hop pellets as my experimental addition. For those who are unfamiliar with the Hop Hearty Ale, it's in the style of an American IPA and is dry-hopped with Cascade and East Kent Goldings. I decided to take tasting notes on a pint without the addition, and then notes on the beer with the addition. I chose Mt. Hood since it's fairly unobtrusive, mild, and wouldn't mess too much with the hop profile of the original. Below are my notes:
Hop Hearty Ale
Appearance: Poured from a 12 oz. bottle into a 6 ounce tasting glass. Color is amber trending towards the red side of the spectrum, with a sticky foam that leaves lacing down the side of the glass.
Aroma: Not too aggressive, and very well-balanced. Some citrus and mint with a bit of a floral scent as well. Caramel, as the label states, is also present.
Taste: Very clean, and extremely easy to drink due to its balanced flavors. Citrus is more present in the taste up front, followed by some mint and ending with a grassy note. The caramel intertwines throughout. I don't think that it is too present at any point of the tasting.
Mouthfeel and thoughts: Definitely a medium body with plenty of carbonation, but not an overwhelming amount. Very, very easy to quaff, what with the balance and flavors present.


Now for the beer, plus Mt. Hood additions. Below are some pictures:
Hops:

Hops with carafe:

Hop Hearty Ale, Mt. Hood addition
Appearance: Same, with some small bits of hoppy goodness.
Aroma: The aroma has a much sweet floral-ness to it. Obviously the beer is now slightly out of balance and trending towards a floral nose; while not a bad thing, I don't think I'd make a dry hop addition out of it.
Taste: Very similar to the original. This is expected, obviously, as the AA% contribution should be near or at zero.
Mouthfeel and overall: Mouthfeel is obviously similar. The balance is slightly out of whack, of course, but I think it is a huge success as an experiment. The aromas contributed from this amount allowed me to see a hop profile in an entirely new light.
This is something that I think every homebrewer should try. Hop profiles can be a difficult thing to anticipate, and this is a cheap, quick, and fun way to experiment with different hops without losing a bunch of money on a failed batch of beer. In the future I think that I'll try it with multiple varieties of hops, as well as experimenting with length of time in the carafe as well as using more aggressive hops. For the record, I did not refrigerate the beer once the hops were added, but simply kept it out for observation. I think a warmer temperature will help profile the aromas a little bit better. I apologize for the formatting. Something happened to the latter half of this post, and currently I'm too lazy to fix it.
Monday, January 9, 2012
Dad's Rye IPA tasting & recipe
My dad got into homebrewing shortly after I did. We’ve brewed many stovetop extract batches together on my visits home (we did an American brown a couple weeks ago), and I’ve put together a number of recipes for him. This is one of those; it’s pretty straightforward, based around the new rye malt syrup that Northern Brewer released last year. It's modeled a bit on NB's Denny's Wry Smile kit, the hops in particular, subbing some of the specialty grains my dad had in stock.
Date - 8 January 2012
Venue - My parents' house (WI)
==========
The beer’s a deep red-brown with a full head on the pour; it drops to a thick film after a few minutes, but doesn’t leave a lot of lacing on the glass. The aroma has a lot of fruit (apricot, maybe?) and floral notes. The taste up front is of dark fruit and malt, followed by a strong bitterness that fades back quickly but lingers for a few moments. There’s a little more fruit in the middle as it warms. It’s medium bodied, the rye lying heavy on the tongue before slickly sliding off; the carbonation is moderate, not prickly but certainly not flat. It’s turned out to be a very tasty beer, with a lively fruitiness without being overly sweet, balanced by solid IPA bitterness.
Dad’s Rye IPA (extract)
Batch size: 4 gallons
Projected OG: 1.052
Projected SRM: 9.2
Projected IBU: 38
Boil time: 60 minutes
Grains/Fermentables
94.1% - 6 lb Rye malt syrup
3.9% - 4 oz Biscuit
2.0% - 2 oz C 120
Hops
.5 oz Columbus (14%) (60 min)
.5 oz Mt. Hood (5.5%) (20 min)
.5 oz Mt. Hood (0 min)
.5 oz Columbus (Dry hop 7 days)
Yeast
1 pkg WY1450 Denny’s Favorite 50
- Br. Absalom
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
